麻豆国产精品

Skip to main content
menu

The Humor Dilemma: Should Your Brand Roast or Toast?

Humor is a powerful tool on social media, but brands often avoid it out of fear of backlash. However, new research from Haile College of Business professors Anh Dang and Jose Saavedra Torres shows that playful roasting, lightly making fun of another鈥攚hen done right鈥攃an lead to higher engagement and positive brand sentiment compared to traditional brand praise (toasting).

But the key to success? Context and execution.

鉁 Roasting works鈥攂ut only when it鈥檚 framed correctly.
鉁 Toasting (compliments) can feel inauthentic if not done right.
鉁 鈥淢essage neutralization鈥 is the secret ingredient that makes humor effective.

In this post, we'll share highlights of their research and provide you with actionable insights you can use in your own business.

cq-text-component-placeholder
Luke Stein Haile Research Lab

Roasting Can Work鈥擨f You Neutralize It

The study found that roasting increases engagement and brand perception鈥攂ut only when it鈥檚 neutralized with context (e.g., National Roast Day) or off-record markers like emojis or playful hashtags.

馃挕 Example: Wendy鈥檚 viral roasting works because audiences expect it. Without context, the same humor could feel too aggressive.

image of Wendys, Coca-Cola, and other brands using humor in social media
cq-text-component-placeholder

How you can apply this to your marketing:

Anh Dang

Dr. Dang says that to use roasting effectively, you should:

  • Use trending moments like National Roast Day.
  • Add emojis, hashtags, or lighthearted phrasing to signal playfulness.
  • Start small鈥攊f your brand isn鈥檛 known for humor, ease into it and wait until your brand is more familiar.

 

Brand Familiarity Matters鈥擝ig Brands Can Roast, Small Brands Should Toast

The research says that the familiar and bigger brands can afford to roast because consumers trust them. For new or lesser-known brands they should focus on toasting to build goodwill first before doing more roasting.

Why? If consumers don鈥檛 recognize a brand, they don鈥檛 know if snarky humor is playful or just mean. Established brands can take more risks, while newer brands should use toasting to build credibility.
 

Dr. Saavedra Torres says that to use roasting effectively, you should:

  • If your brand is well-known, experiment with roasting鈥攂ut always neutralize it.
  • If you鈥檙e building recognition, start with toasting.
  • Track engagement data to see what resonates with your audience.
Jose torres

 

Toasting Works Best When It Feels Genuine

Toasting (complimenting competitors) seems like the 鈥渟afer鈥 option, but research shows forced positivity can actually reduce engagement.

We've found that spontaneous, natural compliments work best while forced positivity can feel inauthentic and disengaging.

Example: Instead of 鈥淪houtout to our friends at [Brand X]!鈥, try:
鈥淗ey [Brand X], your coffee is the only reason we survive Monday meetings!鈥

Anh Dang

Dr. Dang would recommend brands:

  • Only toast when there鈥檚 a clear reason鈥攄on鈥檛 force it.
  • Keep it personal, witty, and conversational.

 

How to Measure Success

鉁 Engagement Rates 鈥 Are people liking, commenting, sharing?
鉁 Brand Mentions 鈥 Are more people talking about your brand?
鉁 Sentiment Analysis 鈥 Are responses positive?

Pro Tip: Marketers can and should run A/B tests with roasting and toasting posts and then see which performs best.


 

Is Humor Right for Your Brand?

  • 馃幆 If your brand is well-known 鈫 Experiment with roasting, but always neutralize it.
  • 馃幆 If your brand is new 鈫 Start with toasting to build credibility.
  • 馃幆 If your brand is more professional 鈫 Use humor sparingly and strategically.

馃挕 Final Thought: The best social media brands show personality and connect with their audience authentically.


 

Let鈥檚 Keep the Conversation Going!

If you found this helpful, follow us on social or subscribe to our newsletter for more research-backed marketing insights.

References

,  and  (2025), "The effects of roasting versus toasting brand-to-brand dialogues on consumer perceptions", , Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 552-600.